EAST CRAZY
MOUNTAINS
Land Exchange Proposal
Public Comments
deadline is December 23, 2022 11:59:59 PM (MST)
Please REJECT this proposal - East Crazy Inspiration Divide
Land Exchange #63115 - Alternative A - No Action
Click
on map to view larger version
Purple flags are Railroad grant deeds with public access language
that we already have.
Not all sections, like south & some east have been researched
yet, so absence does not mean one does not exist..
FS FOIA documents show the
FS was actively seeking RR grants deeds with easement language,
they were like gold, when they found them - this is property
law, you can't just ignore it. Pay attention, also, to the water,
mineral and timber rights language in each deed.
The big question,
why does this land exchange not have an option for the FS to
defend our already existing historical public access???
Crazy
Mountain FS Map with trails
Recently touted as a “made-in-Montana
compromise”, the 3rd land exchange proposal, this time
on the east-side of the Crazy Mountains, is anything but –
let's call it what it is – a big money sellout.
Please REJECT this
East Crazy Inspiration Divide Land Exchange #63115 - Alternative
A - No Action
Due to long-covid complications,
I cannot do the detailed heavy lifting on breaking down all
the necessary points on this exchange. I will focus on the Railroad
Grant Deeds and other evidence of historical public access we
already have that the FS is abandoning, like the public schools
that were there. BHA has done a great breakdown (link below)
of the Preliminary Environmental Assessment (PEA) points, so
I will link to those for readers to include in their comments.
BHA
PEA points - OPPOSING THE EAST CRAZIES LAND SWAP: WHAT YOU NEED
TO KNOW
Guest
Opinion - Reject East Crazy Mountains land swap proposal
- Please join the following local, state and national conservation
organizations in rejecting this proposal. Park County Rod and
Gun Club (Livingston based), Friends of the Crazy Mountains
(Livingston based), Montana Chapter of Backcountry Hunters &
Anglers, Enhancing Montana’s Wildlife and Habitat, Montana
Public Trust Coalition, Helena Hunters and Anglers, Hellgate
Hunters and Anglers, Montana Sportsman’s Alliance and
Skyline Sportsmen.
EMWH Historical
& RR Grant Deed Points
- One of my key points here (pg 4 of the Preliminary Environmental
Assessment (PEA), is the Forest Service's 2017 abandonment from
defending our Crazy Mountains public access that WE ALREADY
HAVE, to backing these landowners in their privatization of
access. The FS states, "The proposal respects the status
quo regarding permissive public access into the upper Sweet
Grass Creek drainage over Rein Lane. The landowners have indicated
that they intend to continue allowing permissive seasonal access
across the private lands they own, so long as private property
is respected." Prior to this, the FS adamantly maintained
these were historic prescriptive easements with public access.
The FS is has been abandoning our long-held public access. Evidence
below (just tip of the evidence iceberg).
A. July
7, 2016 email to FS staff and seasonal volunteers from Yellowstone
District Ranger Alex Sienkiewicz,
B.
FS
Supervisor Mary Erickson's letter to Senator Steve Daines Oct.
2, 2015, "It is a historic trail that dates back a
century or more. The Forest Service maintains that it holds
unperfected prescriptive rights on this trail system as well
as up Sweet Grass Creek to the north based on a history of maintenence
with public funds, and continued public and administrative use."
C. Regional
Forester Hal Salwasser letter to Senator Conrad Burns, Mar.
6, 1996, "...it is our position that the United States
has an easement interest due to historic public and administrative
use and maintenance."
D. U.S.
v. Paul L. Van Cleve 1948 Big Timber Canyon Road legal case
based on 1 section of a Railroad Grant Deed. Esp. pdf pags.
70 & 71, sections V & VI. Black's Law Dictionary
defined Highway as, "A free and public road, way, or street;
one which every person has theright to use. In all counties
of this state, public highways are roads, streets, alleys, lanes,
courts, places, trails, and bridges, laid out or erected as
such by the public."
This case is foundational,
with regard to the Railroad grant deeds with public easement
language. Railroad grant deeds and other historical documents
like public schhol on Sweet Grass documents, are linked on the
left sidebar.
"VI. That the United States
has a special right, title and interest in said highway and
trail and all parts thereof, including the parts thereof situated
upon lands now owned by the defendants, amounting to an easement
and right-of-way for said purposed by reason of the facts that
said road and trail were established upon said land when it
was in part public land of the United States of America and
in part in the ownership of the Northern Pacific Railroad Company...
which said railroad company and railway company dedicated the
same public highway, which was appropriated by the United States
and the general public prior to the issuance of any patents
therefor, thereby reserving unto itself and the general public
said public highway, road and trail, and by reason of the fact
that the United States and its permittees and the public have
for more than 50 years used said road and trail for said purposes
and the United States has, during said period from time to time,
expended upon said road and trail monies appropriated by Congress,
for its contruction and maintenance to the end that it might
serve said purposes; and the United States in common with the
public is entitled to the possession of the right-of-way for
said highway and that the same necessary for the protection,
use and administration of the national forest and other property
of the United States."
"V. That at all times
mentioned herein, there has existed and there now exists a public
highway, viz., a road and trail in and along the canyon of Big
Timber Creek entering said Crazy Mountains Division of said
natioanl forest across the east boundary line... of NE1/4 of
the NE1/4 of section 12, Township 3 North, Range 12 East, extending
westerly... and through and across Sections 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and
6 of said township and range, and thence westerly, then northerly
to a point near the center of Township 4 North, Range 11 East
where it joins the Sweet Grass Trail situated in the Sweet Grass
Canyon ...and the upper drainage of Sweet Grass Creek for the
use by the general public at large of the recreational areas,
camp grounds, parks, and facilities of said national forest,
and by the United States of America on behalf of the general
public at large pursuant to the laws of the United States and
the regulations of the Secretary of Agriculture relating to
the protection, use and administration of the natioanl forest."
From Big Timber on the East
Crazies, thru Half Moon Campground, west on Trail #119 to Section
34 of 4N 11 East by Glacier Lake, then northerly on the S. Fork
of Sweet Grass Trail #122, to the main Sweet Grass Trail, going
east, connecting to the East Trunk Trail # 115/136, then south
back to Big Timber, we already have a loop that the public has
been using for about 100 years. Why would we abandon this?
With this exchange, through
the USFS, the public abandons any claim of the historic access
up Sweet Grass Trail, one of very few important access points
from the east into the Crazies. This will result in an ever-growing
number of users all funneled through a single trailhead in the
southeastern portion of the Crazies. The public will be quickly
pushed off the rolling hills and productive habitat of the low
country and relegated to the steep, high terrain largely consisting
of rock and ice. The landowners, however, receive the valuable
and productive low land.
Background
For the public trust's sake,
you just might want to know some of the details behind it, tip
of the iceberg, and how these land exchanges are shrinking the
Crazy Mountains.
The East-Side
Crazy Mountains Trail Relocation Proposal was worked up
by Tom Glass of the Yellowstone Club, for the "working
group" to present to the Forest Service.
On February 10, 2020, I, Enhancing
Montana's Wildlife & Habitat, attended a private meeting
requested by Tom Glass (Western Land Group, Inc. representing
the Yellowstone Club) and Jess Peterson (Western Skies Strategies),
with our Friends of the Crazy Mountains plaintiffs and attorneys,
involving a proposed eastern Crazy Mountains land exchange between
private landowners and the Custer Gallatin National Forest.
Glass explained that the Yellowstone Club
was in discussions with Custer Gallatin National Forest Supervisor
Mary Erickson, on a proposed land exchange in Big Sky. Glass
was informed that the land they offered the FS, was not an equal
exchange, that they would need to come up with the balance.
Glass then stated that FS Supervisor Mary Erickson directed
them to look to the Crazy Mountains to come up with the value
balance needed. My FOIA requests confirm Glass met with Supervisor
Erickson and Regional Forester Leanne Marten, during the stated
time period.
Glass also stated they did not believe that
a NEPA process would need to be conducted and they were leaning
towards a Congressional exchange, rather than administrative.
Afterward, Glass registered as a Congressional lobbyist, on
behalf of Yellowstone Development, LLC, on March 1, 2020, to
lobby on “Land Exchange Legislation”.
Not only does a legislative exchange potentially
steamroll the process, it can also reduce opportunities for
public involvement – a great concern to me as a public
trust advocate.
Additionally, during the presentation, Glass
and Peterson repeatedly made statements, as to the landowners
status and rights, which contradict public access research I've
done, involving existing public access in the Crazy Mountains:
historical prescriptive easements, Northern Pacific Railroad
grant deeds with public access, and RS2477 public access.
Not only does this east-side land exchange
diminish the approximate 100 year old existing trail system,
it also moves trails to much steeper elevations, limiting the
users who can physically access the trails. This proposal, as
the others, seriously ignores that the public already HAS ACCESS,
if only the FS would simply do their job to defend it from private
landowner obstruction. Taken as a whole, between the east and
west-side exchange being litigated, the proposed southern exchange,
now the east proposal, we are seeing the inexcusable shrinking
of the Crazy Mountains, a theft from the public's hands.
Crazy
Mountains National Forest Public Access Home Page